Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 AD2D 240 - Pipers v. Rosenow

Pipers v. Rosenow’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2005
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brennan v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad · George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New York · Meiselman v. Crown Heights Hospital, Inc. · 51 Cal. 2d 832 - Wolfsmith v. Marsh · 133 Cal. App. 2d 439 - Bauer v. Otis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “merely a reflection of the principle that a jury of laymen ordinarily do not need expert testimony on the question of negligence, itself a function of the conduct of reasonable men.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.