¶1Order unanimously reversed on the law and facts and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Memorandum: In this paternity proceeding the court dis*642missed the petition before petitioner (the first witness) had completed her testimony, and over objection of her counsel who advised the court that he had other witnesses to present. Upon the unusual facts then before the court it appeared unlikely that petitioner could meet her burden of proof without excluding the possibility of paternity by the motel occupant whom she visited, for respondent could be determined to be the father only on evidence which was entirely satisfactory (Matter of Edick v. Martin, 34 A D 2d 1096). Nevertheless, petitioner was entitled to present her other witnesses in an attempt to prove all necessary elements of her case, and the court committed error in granting the premature motion for dismissal of the petition (CPLR 4401; Budner v. Giunta, 16 A D 2d 780; Matter of Driller v. Power, 14 A D 2d 596; Mordoh v. City of New York, 270 App. Div. 896; Levy v. Goldman, 252 App. Div. 781; 4 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 4401.05). (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court dismissing petition in paternity proceeding.) Present—Marsh, J. P., Witmer, Gabrielli, Cardamone and Henry, JJ.
39 A.D.2d 641
Shirley S. v. Robert K. D.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 19, 1972
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1972-04-19
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1984
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1972-04-19
View the full empirical analysis of this case →