Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 AD2D 864 - In re Wolf

In re Wolf’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
February 1986
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barenblatt v. United States · Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. Philippine Air Lines, Inc. · Garland v. Torre · Application of Cepeda

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"the information sought by the subpoena has been published and the source revealed. The statute therefore, cannot be used as a shield to protect that which has already been exposed to view.” 333 N.Y.S.2d at 301 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.