39 Ala. App. 691 - Slagle v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 1989
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Maryland Casualty Co. v. McCallum · 18 Ala. App. 482 - Davis v. State · Magee v. Billingsley · Hull v. State · 31 Ala. App. 62 - Allford v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where bias is admitted, it is not permissible to go further and show the cause of such bias and the details of the causes for such feelings. This for the reason that multiplication of issues is always undesirable. Tuggle v. State, 19 Ala.App. 541 , 98 So. 815 ; King v. State, 23 Ala.App. 572 , 129 So. 316 . As stated by De Graffeinried, J., in Allen v. Fincher, 187 Ala. 599 , 65 So. 946, 948 , if bias is admitted, ‘then there should, at once, be an end of the matter.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Murphy v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.