Murphy v. Gould’s Empirical Analysis
1912
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1942
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 18 App. D.C. 547 - District of Columbia v. Roth · 21 App. D.C. 440 - United States ex rel. Mulvihill v. Clabaugh · 20 App. D.C. 489 - Talty v. District of Columbia · 11 App. D.C. 68 - District of Columbia v. Humphries · 26 App. D.C. 125 - Linsdey v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The bill of exceptions shall be prepared by counsel. If not settled before the jury retires, counsel tendering it shall give two days’ notice in writing to opposing counsel of the time at which it is proposed to submit the same to the court to be settled, and shall also-, at least eight days before the time designated in such notice, present to opposing counsel the proposed -bill or a copy thereof. The bill shall be submitted to tlie court within thirty-eight days after judgment shall have been entered, unless the court shall, for cause shown, extend the time.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hines v. Hines
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.