Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

39 Ark. 174

State v. Parker

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1882

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1882-11-15

Hon. William Walker, Circuit Judge. 1. There is no statute requiring the prosecuting witness, nor any witness, to indorse his name on the indictment. Section 1778, Gantt’s Digest, only provides that the names of the witnesses examined must be indorsed, etc. This is for the convenience of the prosecuting attorney and clerk. The indictment good, without the name of a single toitness indorsed. 2.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1916

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1882-11-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

English, O. J.

¶1At the May term, 1882, of the Circuit Court of Sebastian County, for the Greenwood District, Polk Parker was indicted for assaulting Elisha L. Cobb, with a pistol, with intent to inflict upon him a bodily injury, etc.

¶2The defendant moved to quash the indictment on two grounds:

¶31. Because Elisha L. Cobb, the party charged to have been assaulted, did not indorse his name upon the indictment as prosecutor.

¶42. Because he did not enter into any obligation to pay or secure tlie costs of the prosecution.

¶5The court sustained the motion, quashed the indictment, and discharged the defendant, and the State brought error.

¶6I. By section 98, chapter 52, of Gould’s Digest, taken from the Revised Statutes, no indictment for any trespass on the person or property of another could be preferred, unless the name of the prosecutor was indorsed thereon, except when the same was preferred on the information or knowledge of one or more of the grand jury, or on the information of some public officer, in the necessary discharge of his duty, or the testimony of some witness other than the party injured, in which case, a statement of the fact was required to be made at the end of theúndictment, aud signed by the attorney for the State. See State v. Denton, 14 Ark., 343; State v. Harrison, 19 ib., 565; State v. Stafford, 20 ib., 145; State v. Brown, 10 ib., 104; Gabe alias Santa Anna, 6 ib., 540.

¶7But the Criminal Code, which prescribes the substance of indictments, and what shall be indorsed upon them, contains no such provision, and the above statute was treated as repealed by it, and not carried into Gantt’s Digest. See Gantt’s Digest, Criminal Procedure, taken from the Criminal Code.

¶8II. The statute requiring the prosecutor, or some person for him, to give bond for costs, in prosecutions for misdemeanors (Gantt’s Digest, secs. 3030 to 3034) applies to prosecutions before Justices of the Peace, and other inferior courts, and not to prosecutions by indictment in the Circuit Courts.

¶9Eor practice under this statute, see Mann v. State, 37 Ark., 405.

¶10The judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions to the court below to require defendant to plead to the indictment.

/39/ark/174 · .json · Public domain