Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 B.R. 530 - In Re Klein

In Re Klein’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
March 2015
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2015

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

1201984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1307 · 11 U.S.C. § 323 · 11 U.S.C. § 707 · 18 U.S.C. § 152

Relies on Gill v. Hall (In Re Hall) · Schroeder v. International Airport Inn Partnership · Matter of Jennings · Matter of Williams · Matter of Blackmon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The [bankruptcy] court may dismiss a case ... only after notice and a hearing and only for cause, including— (1) unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors; (2) nonpayment of any fees and charges required under chapter 123 of title 28; and (3) failure of the debtor in a voluntary case to file, within fifteen days ... the information required by paragraph (1) of section 521, but only on a motion by the United States trustee.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It may be reasonably inferred from debt- or’s questionable behavior inside of [sic] bankruptcy that such conduct will persist in derogation of the creditor’s rights in the event this court were to order the dismissal of debtor’s petition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.