Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 B.R. 726 - In Re Crabtree

In Re Crabtree’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
October 2018
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2018

401984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 303 · 11 U.S.C. § 344 · 11 U.S.C. § 521 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 18 U.S.C. § 152 · 28 U.S.C. § 1293

Relies on Fisher v. United States · Counselman v. Hitchcock · United States v. White · United States v. Sullivan · McCarthy v. Arndstein

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Whereas recorded information is clearly `testimonial,' the turnover of property of the estate, exclusive of recorded information, does not involve testimony. (citations omitted) The turnover of assets is incidentally communicative, involving a tacit representation that the assets are property of the estate. Compulsion is obviously involved; a self-incriminatory link may be. Nonetheless, because the turnover of property of the estate, exclusive of recorded information, does not compel testimony on his part, the debtor may not decline to surrender assets of the estate on the basis of the privilege against self-incrimination. The debtor's obligation to surrender his assets is outside the protective scope of the Fifth Amendment." (at 731)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re Devereaux · In re K.M.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.