In Re Blum’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2011
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 302 · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 544
Relies on Greenblatt v. Ford · Napotnik v. Equibank and Parkvale Savings Association · Reid v. Richardson · Hunt, Et Ux. v. Covington · In Re Figueroa
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Debtors argue that one spouse's interest in entireties property is exempt by virtue of Sec. 522(b)(2)(B), that each spouse is entitled to claim his own exemptions separately, and thus that the entireties property is exempt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sumy v. Schlossberg
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.