In Re Barr’s Empirical Analysis
1952
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably 44 Cal. 3d 857 - Adoption of Alexander S. (1988), 56 Cal. App. 4th 1143 - Stanislaus County Department of Social Services v. Noeline P. (1997)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 38 Cal. 2d 676 - Lerner v. Superior Court · 38 Cal. 2d 1 - Reitano v. Yankwich · Vosburg v. Vosburg · 38 Cal. 2d 691 - Gantner v. Gantner · Dabney v. Philleo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not operate to undo action taken before the appeal.” (In re Barr, 39 Cal.2d 25, 28 [ 243 P.2d 787 ].) Its effect is to stay”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Orlando“a perfected appeal” in a proceeding for the custody of a child”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Orlando
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.