39 Cal. 2d 41 - In Re Levi’s Empirical Analysis
1952
Citation profile
172 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 174 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably 53 Cal. 2d 370 - People v. Banks (1959), 51 Cal. 2d 777 - People v. Mattson (1959)
172 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In Re James · 27 Cal. 2d 7 - People v. Sarazzawski · People v. Slobodion · People v. Chesser · People v. Megladdery
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 174 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is neither a constitutional nor a statutory right to a hearing preceding revocation of probation. (In re Davis, 37 Cal.2d 872, 873-874 [ 236 P.2d 579 ].) If a hearing is held, it is not governed by the rules concerning formal criminal trials. The court may revoke probation solely on the basis of the probation officer’s report. (In re Dearo, 96 Cal.App.2d 141, 143 [ 214 P.2d 585 ].) There is no right to present witnesses. (People v. Hayden, 99 Cal.App.2d 97, 99 [ 221 P.2d 221 ].) The constitutional right to have counsel in ' criminal prosecutions’ (art. I, §13) is not applicable since a probation proceeding is not part of a ‘prosecution. ’ (In re Dearo, supra, 96 Cal.App.2d 141, 143; People v. Fields, 88 Cal.App.2d 30, 33 [ 198 P.2d 104 ].)””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Mason“With certain exceptions not applicable here [citations] judgment and sentence in felony cases may be imposed only in the presence of the accused.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.