Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 CAL2D 602 - Hamasaki v. Flotho

Hamasaki v. Flotho’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

154
cited by 154 later decisions
5
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 137 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 154 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably 57 Cal. 2d 346 - People Ex Rel. Dept. of Public Works v. Donovan (1962), 66 Cal. 2d 821 - Jehl v. Southern Pacific Co. (1967)

12 federal appellate · 137 state decisions

6401952196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brewer v. Second Baptist Church · 42 Cal. App. 2d 144 - Bauman v. City and County of San Francisco · Rose v. Melody Lane · Fuentes v. Tucker · 39 Cal. 2d 462 - Leipert v. Honold

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 154 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No appeal lies from the trial court's denial of defendants' motion for new trial; that ruling may be reviewed only through an appeal from the judgment. [Citations.] Defendants have not appealed from the judgment, and, since timely notice of appeal is a jurisdictional requirement [citation], we are without jurisdiction to review the judgment or the denial of defendants' motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “whether or not the trial court, on plaintiffs' motion for a new trial on the issue of damages only, had power to grant a new trial on all issues.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.