Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 Cal. 3d 707 - People v. Maki

39 Cal. 3d 707 - People v. Maki’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

98
cited by 98 later decisions
5
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

95 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 98 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably 41 Cal. 4th 555 - People v. Geier (2007), Commonwealth v. Durling (1990)

95 state decisions

4501985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · 69 Cal. 2d 33 - Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co. · 12 Cal. 3d 96 - In Re Bye · United States v. Marino

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if there [is] sufficient indicia of reliability.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If the invoice were simply printed and filled out by an unidentified hand and devoid of defendant's signature, our conclusion would be that it alone, or even accompanied by the hotel receipt [also signed by the defendant], would be insufficient to find a violation of probation. However, the identification of defendant's signature on the printed invoice and the fact that it is an invoice of the type relied upon by parties for billing and payment of money, lead us to find it sufficient here.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “To prove 'adoption' of a hearsay statement sufficient to make it admissible under [Evidence Code] section 1221, ... it must be shown 'that the party to an action against whom a declarant's hearsay statement is offered as an adoptive admission, (1) had knowledge of the contents of declarant's statement, and (2) having such knowledge, has, by words or other conduct , manifested his adoption or his belief in its truth.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.