Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 Cal. 4th 299 - Flatley v. Mauro

39 Cal. 4th 299 - Flatley v. Mauro’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

535
cited by 535 later decisions
4
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 6 district · 468 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 535 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably 39 Cal. 4th 260 - Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert Hafif (2006), Oasis West Realty v. Goldman (2011)

28 federal appellate · 6 district · 468 state decisions

4240200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rav v. City of St Paul Minnesota · 29 Cal. 4th 53 - Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc. · 29 Cal. 4th 82 - Navellier v. Sletten · 50 Cal. 3d 205 - Silberg v. Anderson · 19 Cal. 4th 1106 - Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & Opportunity

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 535 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “consider the pleadings, and supporting and opposing affidavits stating the facts upon which the liability or defense is based.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “This exclusion from the anti-SLAPP statute's protections may be applied only when 'the defendant concedes, or the evidence conclusively establishes, that the assertedly protected speech or petition activity was illegal as a matter of law .' [Citation.]”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “relevant to the second step in the anti-SLAPP analysis in that it may present a substantive defense a plaintiff must overcome to demonstrate a probability of prevailing.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.