Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

39 Cal. App. 583

179 P 533

Blythe v. Lamberth

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1919

California Court of Appeal · decided 1919-02-04

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1942

1 state decisions

Relies on Herbert Kraft Co. v. Bryan · Sacramento Bank v. Copsey

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1919-02-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1This is an appeal from the judgment. The sole contention made is that the holder of a trust deed given to secure a lien upon real property, after exhausting the remedy by sale and finding that a deficiency exists, may not proceed by action to recover the balance due upon the promissory note. This point was directly decided, long before this appeal was taken, against the contention here urged. (Sacramento Bank v. Copsey, 133 Cal. 663, [85 Am. St. Rep. 242, 66 P. 8, 205]; Kraft Co. v. Bryan,140 Cal. 73, [73 P. 745].)

¶2The appeal is without the slightest merit and should not have been taken.

¶3The judgment appealed from is affirmed, and, it appearing that the appeal was made for delay, it is ordered that the respondent have and recover from the appellant the sum of one hundred dollars as damages.

¶4Conrey, P. J., and Shaw, J., concurred. *584

/39/calapp/583 · .json · Public domain