Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 CALAPP2D 418 - Drummond v. Drummond

Drummond v. Drummond’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
September 1980
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 1980 · most notably French v. Rishell (1953), 141 Cal. App. 2d 812 - Thomas v. Buttress & McClellan, Inc. (1956)

24 state decisions

14019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kenniff v. Caulfield · Hughes v. De Mund · Follmer v. Rohrer · Muzzy v. D. H. McEwen Lumber Co. · 39 Cal. App. 647 - Patterson v. Rutherford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Manual delivery of a deed to the grantee is not essential to the passing of title. No. particular form of delivery is required. Delivery and acceptance of a deed may be manifested by the declarations, acts and conduct of the parties [Citing authorities.] . . . “. . . When the execution and delivery of a deed with the intention of thereby conveying title to the grantee is satisfactorily established, neither the subsequent collection of rental therefrom, the mortgaging of the property without the knowledge or consent of the grantee, nor the attempt to convey it to another person, will vitiate the title of the grantee. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The Supreme Court there held that a duly signed and delivered instrument is presumed to have been delivered at its date, not that it was presumed to have been delivered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.