Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 Cal. App. 3d 550 - People v. Baker

39 Cal. App. 3d 550 - People v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
3
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently December 2013 · most notably 6 Cal. 4th 952 - People v. Crow (1993), People v. Honig (1996)

1 federal appellate · 46 state decisions

15019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 6 Cal. 3d 441 - People v. Beagle · People v. Hamilton · People v. Weiss · 71 Cal. 2d 388 - In Re Allen · 51 Cal. 2d 371 - In Re Osslo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Penal Code section 1203.1 creates and limits the trial court's power to grant probation. [Citation.] It provides in part that the trial court `may in connection with granting probation ... provide for reparation in proper cases' and `may impose and require ... other reasonable conditions, as it may determine are fitting and proper to the end that justice may be done, that amends may be made to society for the breach of the law, for any injury done to any person resulting from such breach and generally and specifically for the reformation and rehabilitation of the probationer....'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[G]eneral costs of prosecuting and rehabilitating criminals”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.