Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 COLO 258 - Lehman v. Pettingell

Lehman v. Pettingell’s Empirical Analysis

1907

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
6
states following
January 1941
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 1941

11 state decisions

4019071910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kindel v. Le Bert · Stoddard v. Benton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The fact that the board may have adjourned without completing its work we do not regard as material. The board can be compelled by mandamus to reconvene to make a canvass of the returns from all the precincts whenever it appears, by proper petition, that it has failed to do so.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.