Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 CONNAPP 162 - Wolf v. Wolf

Wolf v. Wolf’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently May 2011 · most notably Kunajukr v. Kunajukr (2004), Panganiban v. Panganiban (1999)

40 state decisions

210199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 13 Conn. App. 300 - O'Neill v. O'Neill · State v. Dufault · Rhodes v. City of Hartford · Sunbury v. Sunbury · 2 Conn. App. 416 - Ehrenkranz v. Ehrenkranz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(c) In fixing the nature and value of the property, if any, to be assigned, the court, after hearing the witnesses, if any, of each party . . . shall consider the length of the marriage, the causes for the . . . dissolution of the marriage . . . the age, health, station, occupation, amount and sources of income, vocational skills, employability, estate, liabilities and needs of each of the parties and the opportunity of each for future acquisition of capital assets and income. The court shall also consider the contribution of each of the parties in the acquisition, preservation or appreciation in value of their respective estates.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 129 Conn. App. 171 - McRae v. McRae
  2. “without authority to transfer marital property to the children of the marriage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 9201 - Moran v. Moran, No. Fa-96-0713388-S (Jul. 21, 1998)
  3. “not necessarily on her stated desires regarding employment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 14405 - Brandstetter v. Brandstetter, No. Fa96 0156108 S (Dec. 11, 1998)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.