Abdelsayed v. Narumanchi’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 district · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2019
2 district · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. · Garrison v. State of Louisiana · United Families of America v. Kendrick · Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. Connaughton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hile the defendant did prepare a written request to charge, that proposed charge did not distinctly address the issue the defendant now raises. We, therefore, do not address his claim on appeal. [Footnote omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“these words [contained in the defendant's request to charge] did not sufficiently afford notice to the trial court as to the claimed error the defendant now raises”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Actual malice requires that the statement, when made, be made with actual knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.