Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 Conn. Super. Ct. 504 - State v. Gunther

39 Conn. Super. Ct. 504 - State v. Gunther’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
October 2022
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Milton v. Wainwright · In re Disbarment of Allison · Flick v. United States · Saphir v. Neustadt · State v. Gaynor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Court's ruling merely precluded the defendant from establishing what the Court could infer, i.e., that the victim of a crime which results in economic loss may be motivated to testify not only to see that justice is done but also to receive compensation from the criminal, whether it be by order of restitution or a subsequent civil suit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.