Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 DEL 134 - Hoff v. State

Hoff v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
6
states following
December 1979
most recently cited

3 district · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently December 1979 · most notably State v. Hobson (1951), 34 Del. Ch. 380 - Brennan v. Black (1954)

3 district · 36 state decisions

15019381940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mugler v. State of Kansas State of Kansas Tufts · Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan · Slaughter-House Cases the Butchers' Benevolent Association of New Orleans v. The Crescent City Live · Lawton v. Steele · Minnesota v. Barber

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Beauty culture is not one of the learned professions. It is a quite common occupation in many of its features. The manner and extent of its regulation ought not to be out of balance with a common sense regard for the protection of the public health. The act, considered as a whole, is unreasonable and oppressive. It far exceeds the necessity that may exist to protect the public against ignorance and unsanitary practices. The provisions which have been particularly considered have no substantial relation to the public health and safety....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““To justify the State in interposing its authority in behalf of the public, it must appear that the interests of the public, as distinguished from those of a particular class, demand such interference; that the means employed are reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the purpose;””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.