Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 F.1d 389 - Union Paper-Bag Machine Co. v. Waterbury

Union Paper-Bag Machine Co. v. Waterbury’s Empirical Analysis

39 F. 389 · 1889

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
April 1931
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1931

4 federal appellate ·

40188918901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mahn v. Harwood · Coon v. Wilson · United States v. Morton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(1) The herein-described process or method of forming paper bags by making in a sheet of paper or blank the folds, B and C, then pasting together the two sides, Ag As, forming a bellows-sidetl body or tnbe of the bag, then spreading open one end of said body or tube, then forming the inwardly-projecting triangular folds, H, H, side laps, tí, G, and laps, I, J, which latter are secured in place by pasting or otherwise, substantially as described. (2) A bag consisting of a bellows-sided tube having a satchel bottom and inward triangular folds, which form part of its two sides when distended.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.