Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 F.2d 43 - Blair v. Wilson Syndicate Trust

Blair v. Wilson Syndicate Trust’s Empirical Analysis

39 F.2d 43 · 1930

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
September 1991
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently September 1991 · most notably Richards v. Commissioner (1936), Washburn v. Commissioner (1931)

19 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1601930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Flint v. Stone Tracy Co. · Hecht v. Malley · United States v. Emery, Bird, Thayer Realty Co. · Zonne v. Minneapolis Syndicate · Hecht v. Malley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A distinction is to be made between an agreement between individuals in the form of a trust and an Express trust created by an ancestor, although they may have some features in common. The controlling distinction is that one is a voluntary association of individuals for convenience and profit, the other a method of equitably distributing a legacy or donation. Congress has recognized this distinction, classing the former as associations, to be taxed as corporations, and at the same time providing for a separate and distinct method of taxing the income of estates and trusts created by will or deed, classing them together for that purpose.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.