Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 F.2d 447 - Gamble v. Daniel

Gamble v. Daniel’s Empirical Analysis

39 F.2d 447 · 1930

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
July 2005
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2005 · most notably MacDonald v. Plymouth County Trust Co. (1932), Cash Currency Exchange, Inc. v. Shine (1985)

24 federal appellate · 4 district ·

25019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cunningham v. Brown · Harrison v. Chamberlin · Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. Fox · International Shoe Co. v. Pinkus · Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[In 1910, at the time of the adoption of the “banking corporation” exception], the ordinary conception of a bank was of a business which was based primarily on the receipt of deposits (general or special), which deposits were used by the bank for loans, discounts, buying and selling commercial paper, and other business purposes.... The prime incentive in engaging in the business was the profit to be made, directly or indirectly, from the use of deposits. Most of the then existing state legislation concerning banks had as its principal purpose the protection of such depositors. Much of the right to regulate banks was the public interest in protecting depositors. Banking has been a development, and the above was its status in 1910. Other businesses might and did, and still do, deal in commercial paper, make loans or borrow money without any one thinking of them as banks. When a business takes deposits and then does the above or related things, every one knows it is doing a banking business. * * * In short, while there may be other attributes which a bank may possess, yet a necessary one is the receipt of deposits which it may use in its business.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a business which [is] based primarily on the receipt of deposits (general or special), which deposits [are] used by the bank for loans, discounts, buying and selling commercial paper, and other business purposes.... The prime incentive in engaging in the business [is] the profit to be made, directly or indirectly, from the use of deposits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.