Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 F.2d 564 - United States v. Dennett

United States v. Dennett’s Empirical Analysis

39 F.2d 564 · 1930

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
June 1985
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1985 · most notably Roth v. United States (1957), Ginsberg v. New York (1968)

23 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions

160193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rosen v. United States · Dunlop v. United States · Dysart v. United States · People v. . Eastman · Knowles v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[T]he test most frequently laid down seems to have been whether it would tend to deprave the morals of those into whose hands the publication might fall by suggesting lewd thoughts and exciting sensual desires.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “rationalize and dignify [sex] emotions rather than to arouse lust”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.