Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 F.2d 800 - Clarke v. Boysen

Clarke v. Boysen’s Empirical Analysis

39 F.2d 800 · 1930

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2014 · most notably United States of America, the Walker River Paiute Tribe of Nevada and Robert Benton v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company, United States of America v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company (1976), Cloutman v. Weill (1932)

17 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

100193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 118

Relies on Winters v. United States · Galliher v. Cadwell · Shepley v. Cowan · American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co. · Fertilizing Company v. Hyde Park

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where a tenant in common wrongfully excludes his cotenant from the common property and holds and claims it adversely to his cotenant, he is liable to his cotenant for the latter's proportionate share of the reasonable rental value of the property, during the period of such occupancy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “before the grant . . . shall become effective a map . . . must be filed with and approved by the Secretary . . . and the company must make payment to the Secretary . . . for the benefit of the tribe . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “which compensation shall be determined . . . under the direction of the Secretary of the Interior, in such manner as he may prescribe.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.