Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 F.2d 998 - Wells v. United States

Wells v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

39 F.2d 998 · 1930

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
June 1969
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1969

4 federal appellate ·

601930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 30 Cal. App. 363 - Spreckels v. State of California · Starck v. Commissioner · Shwab v. Doyle · Rea v. Heiner · Meyer v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘ contemplation of death ’ does not mean that general knowledge of all men that they must die, but that there must be a present apprehension, from some existing bodily or mental condition or impending peril, creating a reasonable fear that death is near at hand, and that such reasonable fear or apprehension must be the direct or animating cause, and the only cause of the transfer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the immediate and moving cause of the transfers was the carrying .out of a policy, long followed by decedent in dealing with his children, of making liberal gifts to them during his lifetime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The doctors pronounce me cured of bowel trouble, but I will always have asthma. I weigh 140 stripped.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.