Bator v. Hawaii’s Empirical Analysis
39 F.3d 1021 · 1994
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 41 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Wallace v. DTG Operations, Inc. (2006), Manikhi v. Mass Transit Administration (2000)
14 federal appellate · 41 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]ven if the contours of a supervisor's responsibility are uncertain, complete inaction in the face of claimed harassment cannot be objectively reasonable conduct entitling a supervisor to qualified immunity.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a plaintiff must show intentional discrimination ... for equal protection claims (but not for Title VII claims)”); Beardsley, 30 F.3d at 529 (noting that “courts have held that intentional sexual harassment of employees by persons acting under color of state law violates the Fourteenth Amendment and is actionable under § 1983”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“if the factual context makes the nonmoving party's claim implausible, then that party must come forward with more persuasive evidence than would otherwise be necessary to show that there is a genuine issue for trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.