Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 F.3d 1064 - Dobbs v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.

Dobbs v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

39 F.3d 1064 · 1994

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
August 2000
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Hanson v. Denckla · Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. Hall · McGee v. International Life Insurance · 47 Cal. 3d 654 - Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Sjummary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together' with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. If the movant bears the burden of showing the absence of a genuine issue of material fact, the nonmovant may not rest on its pleadings but must set forth specific' facts showing a genuine issue for trial as to those dispositive matters for which it carries the burden of proof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Wyoming applies “the law of the state where the cause of action arose.” Dworkin v. Hustler Magazine, Inc., 647 F.Supp. 1278, 1281 (D.Wyo.1986). Accordingly, in a contract action, the applicable law is that of the forum in which performance was to occur or where the contract was made. Wyoming Construction Co. v. Western Casualty and Surety Co., 275 F.2d 97, 105 (10th Cir.1960).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[vlerbal assurances of a term of employment cannot defeat [the at-willl presumption unless accompanied by some form of written documentation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.