Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

39 F.3d 1176

Docket No. 94-6839.

Faulkner v. Purnell C D

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: Sept. 26, 1994. Decided: Oct. 27, 1994.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-10-27

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on In Re: William T. Davis, Jr. Jeanette C. Davis

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-10-27

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-93-3984-JFM)

Alvin Faulkner, appellant pro se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Faulkner v. Purnell, No. CA-93-3984-JFM (D. Md. July 22, 1994). We deny Faulkner's motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/39/f3d/1176 · .json · Public domain