Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

39 F.3d 1189

Docket No. 93-50855.

United States v. Cook

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Nov. 1, 1994.* Decided Nov. 8, 1994.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-11-08

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113

Relies on Anders v. California · Penson v. Ohio · United States v. Thomas Andrew John

Decided 1994-11-08

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

¶1

MEMORANDUM…

¶2

Robbin Bradley Cook appeals his conviction and 46-month sentence following his guilty plea to unarmed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Cook's counsel filed a brief stating that he finds no arguable issues for review and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel of record is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

…

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

/39/f3d/1189 · .json · Public domain