Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 F.3d 231 - Barlow v. Ground

Barlow v. Ground’s Empirical Analysis

39 F.3d 231 · 1994

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
3
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Unicorn Tales, Inc. v. Banerjee (1998), Jalapeno Property Management, LLC v. Dukas (2001)

13 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions

1801994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Relies on Doerr v. Doerr · Martin v. Delaware · Aldrich v. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections · Barlow v. Ground · 33 Cal. App. 3d 808 - Shoei Kako Co. v. Superior Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the court may order substitution of the proper parties.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the suggesting party must serve other parties and nonparty successors or representatives of the deceased with a suggestion of death.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “there is no guarantee that the party personally will receive notice. It can generally be presumed, however, that a party's attorney will notify the party of important developments and take appropriate action to protect the party's interests.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.