Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 F.3d 269 - Noland v. McAdoo

Noland v. McAdoo’s Empirical Analysis

39 F.3d 269 · 1994

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably David v. City And County Of Denver (1997), Whitney v. State of New Mexico (1997)

20 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions

2501994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Siegert v. Gilley · United Air Lines, Inc. v. Evans · Liteky v. United States · Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · Deepwater Investments Limited v. Jackson Hole Ski Corporation M

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An allegation of sexual harassment is actionable under § 1983 as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.... [H]owever, ... in order to establish the state action necessary to support a § 1983 claim, defendant ... had to be plaintiff's supervisor or in some other way exercise state authority over her.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]n allegation of sexual harassment is actionable under § 1983 as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a supervisor or employer participates in or consciously acquiesces in sexual harassment by an outside third party or by co-workers.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.