United States v. Devoll’s Empirical Analysis
39 F.3d 575 · 1994
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably 691 So. 2d 1273 - State v. Green (1997), United States v. Krilich (1998)
20 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1818 · 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on United States v. Olano · United States v. Frady · United States v. Atkinson · Williams v. United States · Department of Revenue of Montana v. Ranch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e are not persuaded that the statute imposes liability whenever a defendant's false statement was intended to interfere with any activity of a financial institution; such a broad interpretation of section 1014 presumably would encompass fraud or false representations having nothing to do with financial transactions, such as fraud in an employment contract or, for example, in a contract to provide goods or services for custodial care, premises repair, or renovation.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Reversible error exists when the jury charge, as a whole, misled the jury as to the elements of the offense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“To obtain a conviction under § 1014, the Government must establish two propositions: it must demonstrate (1) that the defendant made a `false statement or report,' ... and (2) that he did so `for the purpose of influencing in any way the action of [a described financial institution] upon any application, advance,... commitment, or loan.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.