Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 F.3d 650 - Corbin v. Blankenburg

Corbin v. Blankenburg’s Empirical Analysis

39 F.3d 650 · 1994

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently September 2017

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

70199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1102 (§ 402 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on Golden v. Zwickler · Doerr v. Doerr · California v. ARC America Corp. · B.D. International Discount Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. · Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Independent Federation of Flight Attendants

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “create a plethora of problems in the judicial process. Logically, if every jurisdictional problem could be cured by relating the successor’s standing to the commencement of the suit, there would be no need for rules delineating the time and manner of substitutions. Thus, by adopting the position of the majority, we undermine the integrity of the judiciary to determine its own jurisdiction by transferring to the parties the power to manufacture and recapture jurisdiction at will.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.