United States v. Hines’s Empirical Analysis
39 F.3d 74 · 1994
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Carnegie v. United States · Verderber v. Cantello Plumbing Corp. · Gregory v. Frontier Materials, Inc. · United States v. Tresvant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“evidence of all the joined crimes would be mutually admissible for legitimate purposes in separate trials for each offense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“must balance any possible prejudice to the accused against the interest of the efficient administration of justice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.