United States v. Barone’s Empirical Analysis
39 F.3d 981 · 1994
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1028 (Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act of 1998) · 18 U.S.C. § 1365 (Federal Anti-Tampering Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 513 · 18 U.S.C. § 844 · 18 U.S.C. § 875
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Turkette · Perez v. United States · National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Scheidler · Weissbrodt v. White Mountain Apache Tribe of Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“means a legal entity, other than a government, established or organized for any purpose, and includes a corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, joint stock company, foundation, institution, society, union, or any other association or persons which operates in or the activities of which affect interstate or foreign commerce^] 3 . A check is a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“enterprise” involved affect interstate commerce, we have held that the requisite interstate nexus may be found from the predicate acts charged in the indictment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.