United States v. Wooten’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
December 2014
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 31 U.S.C. § 5324 (§ 1354 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Apprendi v. New Jersey · United States v. Stone · United States v. Adamo · Logan v. Dayton Hudson Corp.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.