¶1 Carvel E. Benson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Benson, No. CA-89-136-2 *948 (E.D.Va. Apr. 24, 2002). Benson’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.'
¶2 AFFIRMED.