Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 FLA 95 - Shouse v. Doane

Shouse v. Doane’s Empirical Analysis

1897

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
4
states following
June 1998
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently June 1998 · most notably 302 So. 2d 404 - Blackhawk Heat. & P. Co., Inc. v. Data Lease Fin. Corp. (1974), Dehuy v. Osborne (1928)

1 federal appellate · 36 state decisions

9018971900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cheney v. Libby · Tate v. Pensacola, Gulf, Land & Development Co. · Smith v. Lewis · Clark v. Weis · Dana v. St. Paul Investment Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The complainant was not required to make an unconditional tender. His tender must be, in its nature, conditional only, and dependent on and to be performed only in case of the readiness of tbe other party to perform Ms part of the agreement. The requirement of a ‘tender of purchase money,’ used in this connection, does not mean a tender strictly valid at law, but means a present readiness, willingness, and ability in good faith to perform the acts required of one by the agreement, provided the other party will concurrently do the things which he is required by the contract to do, and notice by the former to the latter of such readiness, willingness, and ability.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.