Amdur v. Lizars’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 1982
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77A (§ 1 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78I (§ 9 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Landis v. North American Co. · Hurn v. Oursler · Estes v. Texas · Fischman v. Raytheon Mfg. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not prepared ... to hold the express remedies, such as ... Section 9(a) ..., made available by the (1934) Act ... can be ignored or by-passed in favor of an implied remedy derived from a rule passed by the Commission under the same Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“would, in all probability, be completely independent of, and without reference to, any of the facts involved in Count IV,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Amdur v. Lizars“so long as plaintiffs' suit in the Circuit Court of Baltimore City remains outstanding and undecided.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Amdur v. Lizars
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.