Fields-D'Arpino v. Restaurant Associates, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2011
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 651 · 28 U.S.C. § 652 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Emle Industries, Inc. v. Patentex, Inc. · Board of Education v. Nyquist · Evans v. Artek System Corp. · Cheng v. Gaf Corporation · GAF Corp. v. Cheng
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“confidential information” with Westbrook, in order to address Occidental’s claims. 8 . When ruling on disqualification motions, courts in this circuit have considered both the New York Code as well as pronouncements by the American Bar Association (the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.