39 F. Supp. 2d 495 - Mruz v. Caring, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 16 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927 · 31 U.S.C. § 3730 (False Claims Act)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Erie Co v. Tompkins · Younger v. Harris · Hishon v. King & Spalding · Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While all well-pled allegations are accepted as true and reasonable inferences are drawn in the plaintiff's favor, the Court may dismiss a complaint where, under any set of facts which could be shown to be consistent with a complaint, the plaintiff is not entitled to relief.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In considering a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, the Court may dismiss a complaint if it appears certain the plaintiff cannot prove any set of facts in support of its claims which would entitle it to relief.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“test is even applicable, the Board's claims survive it. Since that is the last of the many standing hurdles, I conclude further that, aside from its claims for certain attorney's fees, Deptford has standing to bring its Third-Party Complaint. B. The Merits 1. Rule 12(b)(6) Standard Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) governs motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.