39 F. Supp. 2d 542 - Madison v. Resources for Human Development, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 125 · 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 29 U.S.C. § 213
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Mitchell v. Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc. · Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. Worthington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as 24 services of a household nature performed by an employee in or about a private home (permanent or temporary) of the person by whom he or she is employed. The term includes employees such as cooks, waiters, butlers, valets, maids, housekeepers, governesses, nurses, janitors, laundresses, caretakers, handymen, gardeners, footmen, grooms, and chauffeurs . . . . This listing is illustrative and not exhaustive. 25 The District Court understood this regulation to mean the exemption applied only to employees who”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“21 The District Court held the FLSA companionship exemption did not apply to RHD's Mandela and Visions employees. That provision excludes from FLSA minimum wage and maximum hours rules: 22 [A]ny employee employed in domestic service employment to provide companionship services for individuals who (because of age or infirmity) are unable to care for themselves (as such terms are defined and delineated by regulations of the Secretary) . . . . 23 29 U.S.C. S 213(a)(15). The statute does not define”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]lthough the plaintiffs are employed by RHD rather than the individuals they serve, that by itself does not exclude them from the exemption.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.