39 F. Supp. 2d 635 - Daniel v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “A witness shall be qualified to testify as an expert on the standard of care if he demonstrates expert knowledge of the standards of the defendant’s specialty and of what conduct conforms or fails to conform to those standards and if he has had active clinical practice in either the defendant’s specialty or a related field of medicine within one year of the date of the alleged act or omission forming the basis of the action, (emphasis added).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 750 F. Supp. 2d 574 - Jones v. Bagalkotakar

2. “No attorney or party litigant shall personally, or through any investigator or other person acting for the attorney or party litigant, interview, examine or question any juror or alternate juror with respect to the verdict or deliberations of the jury in any action, civil or criminal, except on leave of such court granted upon good cause shown and upon such conditions as the court shall fix.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. United States v. Brown