Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

39 Ga. App. 522

Epstein v. Esserman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 9, 1929

Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1929-04-09

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 1960

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1929-04-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Broyles, C. J.

¶11. Under the pleadings the court did not err in ruling that the defendants had the right to open and conclude the argument.

¶22. In the light of the facts of the ease and the charge of the court, none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial, complaining of certain excerpts from the charge and of the failure to charge certain things, show error requiring a new trial.

¶33. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

¶4 Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.
/39/gaapp/522 · .json · Public domain