State v. Bubis’s Empirical Analysis
1924
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1969
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on People v. Warfield
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Surely, however, he would be conscious of some reason; that is to say, a verdict should be based upon the operation of mental processes and the exercise of judgment. That this language is not prejudicial error, see State v. Gilbert, supra; [ 8 Idaho 346 at 351 , 69 P. 62 , 1 Ann.Cas. 280]; State v. Moon, 20 Idaho 202 , 117 P. 757 , Ann.Cas. 1913A, 724; State v. Nolan, 31 Idaho 71 , 169 P. 295 . “We find no reversible error in the record. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dickens
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.