39 Ill. App. 3d 476 - Varnes v. Dougherty’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
23 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Moline Tool Co. v. Department of Revenue · 15 Ill. 2d 301 - Pearce Hospital Foundation v. Illinois Public Aid Commission · 80 Ill. App. 2d 329 - Oliver v. Civil Service Commission · People ex rel. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Hulman · 30 Ill. App. 3d 806 - Varnes v. Lentz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Every action to review a final administrative decision shall be commenced by the filing of a complaint and the issuance of summons within 35 days from the date that a copy of the decision sought to be reviewed was served upon the party affected thereby.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“This 35-day limit is a jurisdictional requirement [citation], and a plaintiff who fails to file a complaint within the specified period is time-barred from seeking review of the agency decision. [Citation.] * * * In short, once plaintiff received notice via certified mail * * * of the director's suspension order, his only recourse was to file an administrative review action within 35 days.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.