Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 Ill. App. 3d 954 - People v. Hrusosky

39 Ill. App. 3d 954 - People v. Hrusosky’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
2
states following
October 1990
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently October 1990 · most notably Syck v. Snyder (1990), 86 Ill. 2d 147 - People v. Brown (1981)

41 state decisions

230197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 21 Ill. App. 3d 1014 - People v. Overton · 29 Ill. App. 3d 731 - People v. Grant · 30 Ill. App. 3d 906 - People v. Taylor · 34 Ill. App. 3d 393 - People v. Ladewig · Green v. Department of Children & Family Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““D. ‘Unfit person’ means any person whom the court shall find to be unfit to have a child sought to be adopted, the grounds of such unfitness being any one of the following: # O # (b) Failure to maintain a reasonable degree of interest, concern or responsibility as to the child’s welfare; # # t* (d) Substantial neglect of the child if continuous or repeated; (e) extreme or repeated cruelty to the child; # e e (g) Failure to protect the child from conditions within his environment injurious to the child’s welfare; # # # »”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"In other cases where the appellate court reversed the trial court['s] order terminating parental rights, the time of separation between the parent and the child was often much less than in the case before us. There were problems such as long distances between parent and child and a corresponding lack of transportation for the parent. The evidence showed in those cases an attitude of blocking visitation attempts on the part of the Department and there was usually a showing of many attempts at visitation by the parent, or at least constant inquiry by the parent as to the child's health and situation, and the regular sending of letters and presents to the child." [Citations.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.